i think i told you before, it's simple supply and offer rule. There is a looooot of people trying to get money with their art (a lot of offer) and not that much people willing to supply their offers, an AI would make sense if there was a lot of people wanting to buy arts or pay artists but that's far from reality, it's already hard to get a single dollar donated. AI will get even better and popular, it's is just a matter of time for it conquer the artists areas like comercial illustrations, comissions, and even animation. They don't care about the copyright it's just another sign that they don't care about the real artists, their jobs, their offers, etc
Noilaedi
I like the concept of using it for improvement but everything else is just way too much baggage for me, especially the whole possible theft aspect.
jthrash
That’s exactly how I used it on that one Art Portal piece, “The Crazed Hippo Man of the North.” Even then, I’m now worried about accidental plagiarism whenever I try to use AI art as reference, so until that is fixed I’ll just use image search engines where I can at least quickly learn where the art originated from. Again, this could very easily be fixed by training algorithms exclusively on CC0/public domain art or paying artists properly for their consent to use their art for the algorithm.