I am very upset to learn recently that ArtStation, the site I use to host my 3D modeling portfolio, is showing un-altered AI-generated art next to human-made art that likely took the artist weeks, months or even years to make without giving viewers any clear distinction about which is which. This is obviously a problem for me personally because, again, my main portfolio can be found on ArtStation, yet the site itself is unfairly making me compete with machines that can quickly generate art as good if not better than what I can do at my current skill level and thus making it significantly harder than it already is to stand out from the crowd and get hired via ArtStation. Not to mention that every time I submit a new piece to my ArtStation portfolio, it’s probably being used for algorithms like Stable Diffusion, which are known to use work from ArtStation and DeviantArt without any regard to copyright.
Fortunately, as of this writing there is a troll campaign from ArtStation Pro subscribers and even established industry vets to flood the “Trending” tab with “No to AI Art” protest imagery or written essays as to why the technology needs to be regulated.
This is my favorite protest piece so far:
https://www.artstation.com/artwork/03Pbz4
Besides providing counter-arguments to common refrains from proponents of using AI art as finished pieces, those of you excessively worried about a future we cannot predict like I am may want to pay attention to the last few paragraphs, stating that we should not give up on our passions just because a budding new technology scares us; the graphic design industry has dealt with AI art longer than concept and character designers have, and while it has undeniably cost some job opportunities (why hire your neighbor who is a graphic designer to design a bake sale flyer for your church when you could just make it yourself with a Canva template?), it has also INCREASED demand for weirder and more stand-out human designs as those pre-made templates get more and more overused and rich people pay top dollar just to have something different; and there is tons you can do to discourage people from using AI art as finished pieces on social media until current concerns are addressed, including contacting ArtStation’s customer support in this case.
This is my second-favorite protest piece just for the satire:
https://www.artstation.com/artwork/Qnl8Y3
People who already think AI art and robotics in general are superior to humans despite its tendency to mangle up hands, feet and eyes even worse than a beginner artist ever could remind of Dr. Robotnik in the Paramount Sonic movies—they seem to want to believe that machines are better or will be better than humans, probably because they were bullied and cast out when they were in school, and refuse to believe there are subjective or intangible reasons why human workers may always be necessary, even when faced with recent news stories of companies shelving plans on self-driving cars because they just can’t figure out how to make these cars safe on the road without at least a little human input, or YouTube’s algorithm causing drama because it still isn’t capable of seeing content with nuance (unlike the mysterious human brain) before unfairly banning a video or user.
They either believe too much in current AI technology or are just not as observant as most people if they think a generated piece featuring a “beautiful woman” with 13 wispy fingers on one hand and sunken marbles for eyes is already capable of replacing humans entirely.
This is a disappointing, but not surprising move from ArtStation. They almost let NFTs on their platform last year back when that was the big tech fad of the year before wisely backing down when people started cancelling their ArtStation Pro subscriptions as a result (and of course, NFTs are on their last legs these days, so it was smart of them to hold off on that trend, anyway). Hopefully they’ll listen to their users again, but if they double down or continue to make changes that clearly hurt artists on their site looking for jobs, I may have to find somewhere else to host my best work. Maybe even hire a human web designer to prove a point, if I have the money.
Finasty
What a chad Artstation
That's a good thing to keep AI art away from social medias
jthrash
ArtStation seems to be starting to address the problem since I first typed this…essay. It’s kind of a half-measure like DeviantArt so far (I can choose not to have my art used in AI algorithms, but I have to do it myself and by default my art will be used in those algorithms, once they get around to implementing this feature), but considering it’s a portfolio site, it’s a good thing they’re responding to the controversy so quickly, like they did before with the NFT/crypto controversy.